a place to post and comment on poetry

Archive for December, 2011

M.I,5-Persecut ion – why won' t the B ritish po lice do the ir j ob an d pu t a sto p to it?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= why won’t the British police do their job and. put a stop to it? -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

The British. police obviously do know what is taking place. Besides my
interpretations of what individual officers have. said which forces that
conclusion, it would be. inconceivable for them to be unaware of something
on. this scale.

If they know, then they will know that the abusers have broken. laws in the
UK and abroad. Recently the UK introduced. laws against electronic spying
which. carry a penalty of several years jail if caught. If the police know
illegal. harassment is taking place, and do nothing about it, then they are
failing in their. responsibilities.

Last Easter (1995) I went into the local. police station in London and spoke
to an officer about the harassment against me. But I. couldn’t provide
tangible evidence; what people said, in. many cases years ago, is beyond
proof, and without something to support my statements I cannot. expect a
police officer to. take the complaint seriously.

The current. situation with regard to the police is not one which allows a
breakthrough in dealing with. the problem. On the one hand, most individual
officers at. a local police station may not know about the ongoing assaults,
so a complaint at that level will not yield results. Yet. the police as an
organisation do know of the harassment, and they. must be aware that a
complaint has been made at a police station. So. it is clearly their duty to
take preventative action against the continuing. molestation, but because
the. criminals are operating on behalf of a state agency, the police are not
carrying out their. duty.

1120

.
posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

M-I,5.Per secution ` w hy wo n't t he Bri tish poli ce do thei r jo b a nd put a sto p to it?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= why won’t the British police do their. job and put a stop to it? -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

The British police obviously do know what is taking. place. Besides my
interpretations of what individual officers have said which. forces that
conclusion, it would be. inconceivable for them to be unaware of something
on. this scale.

If they know, then they will know that the abusers have broken laws in. the
UK and abroad.. Recently the UK introduced laws against electronic spying
which carry a penalty of. several years jail if caught. If the police know
illegal. harassment is taking place, and do nothing about it, then they are
failing in. their responsibilities.

Last Easter (1995) I went into the local police station in London. and spoke
to an officer about the harassment against me. But. I couldn’t provide
tangible evidence; what people. said, in many cases years ago, is beyond
proof, and without something. to support my statements I cannot expect a
police officer to take the. complaint seriously.

The current situation with regard. to the police is not one which allows a
breakthrough in dealing with the. problem. On the one hand, most individual
officers at a local police station. may not know about the ongoing assaults,
so a complaint at that level will not yield results. Yet. the police as an
organisation do know of the harassment, and they. must be aware that a
complaint has been made at. a police station. So it is clearly their duty to
take preventative action against the continuing. molestation, but because
the criminals are operating on behalf of a state agency, the police are. not
carrying. out their duty.

1120

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

M I`5,Persecut ion , ab use in se t-up s ituations an d in publi c

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=–=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= abuse. in set-up situations and in public -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=–=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Strangers in the street have recognized me. on sight many times, and shown
awareness of. the current thread of abuse. To give you one example, in 1992
I was seriously ill, and. a manager at work somewhat humorously said that
"it wasn’t. fair" that people were bullying me. A few days later, I attended
for the first. time a clinic in London as an outpatient, and on my way out
was accosted by someone who. asked if "they had paid my fare", with emphasis
on. the word "fare". He repeated the word several times in this different
context; that they should have paid my "fare",. each time emphasizing the
word.

For two and a half years from. the time their harassment started until
November 1992 I refused. to see a psychiatrist, because I reasoned that I
was not ill of my own action or fault, but through the stress. caused by
harassment, and that a lessening of. the illness would have to be consequent
to a removal. of its immediate cause, in other words a cessation of
harassment. I also reasoned that since they were taunting me. with jokes
about mental illness, if I. were to seek treatment then the abusers would
think that they had "won". and been proved "right". Remember, the constant
theme of any persecution is, "we must destroy you because. you’re X",
whether X is a racial or other attribute.. In this case the X was "we
persecute you because you have. brain disease". The similarity of this logic
to Nazi attitudes to the mentally. ill is striking.

The same manager who’d said "it wasn’t. fair" asked me in winter 1992 why I
didn’t seek help from a psychiatrist; was it, he asked, because "they. would
think they had won" if. I sought treatment? That was something I’d never
said. at work… again, taken separately it proves nothing, but many such
things over a period of months proves conclusively that. people in the
company knew what was. going on, and in quite a lot of detail.

Usually harassment in public lacks. the level of finesse of "paying your
fare". Most people’s imagination does not. go beyond moronic parroting of
the current term of denigration. That is not surprising given the. average
level of the abusers; if they do not have the intelligence to. distinguish
wrong from right then neither will they. have the capacity for anything
other than. mindless repetition of a monosyllabic term calculated to fit
into. their minds.

The first incidents of verbal assault in. public were in again in the summer
of 1990, although they increased in frequency and venom. with time. In July
1990 the. first public incident occurred on a tube train on the Northern
line. Two men and their girlfriends recognised. me; the women sprang to my
defence, saying. "He looks perfectly normal, he doesn’t look ill". Their
boyfriends of course knew better, and followed the party. line; one of them
made reference to an "operation", apparently to work at the. tube station
but implicitly to a visit that I had made to hospital a couple. of weeks
previously.

In August 1990. going home from college, soon after getting on a tube train
at. Gloucester Road I was followed by a group of four youths, who started a
chant of abuse. That they were. targeting me was confirmed by other people
in. the carriage, one of whom asked the other "who are they going on at, is
it the bloke who just got. on?" to which the second replied "yes, I think
so". I was tempted to reply, but as in every other. instance the abusers are
enabled in their cowardice. by physically outnumbering the abused; any
confrontation would result in. my being beaten up, followed by a complaint
to the police that "he attacked us", and. of course he’s ill, so he must
have been imagining. that we were getting at him. Shitty, aren’t they?

But the. shittiness of the four youths on the tube train is as nothing
compared to the episode on the National Express coach to Dover. in the
summer of 1992. While going on holiday to. the Continent I was verbally set
upon. by a couple travelling sitting a few rows behind. The boy did the
talking, his. female companion contributing only a continuous empty giggling
noise. He spoke loudly to ensure other. people on the coach heard, always
about "they" and "this. bloke" but never naming either the abusers or the
person. he was talking about. He said "they" had "found somebody from his
school, and he was always really. stressed at school". They must have dug
deep to find enemies. there; perhaps someone who dropped out of school,
someone who didn’t do too well later, who was jealous and keen. to get their
own back? The boy also said. "he was in a bed and breakfast for only one
night and they got him". By. a not unexpected coincidence I had been in a
B&B in Oxford. a week previously, which had been booked from work; other
things lead me to the conclusion that the company’s offices were bugged. for
most of the 2 1/2 years that I was there, so "they" would. have known a room
in the B&B had been. booked. (But I’ll bet "they" didn’t tell the company’s
managers. their offices were bugged, did they?).

After a few minutes of this I went back to where they. were sitting and
asked. where they were travelling. The boy named a village in France, and
the girl’s giggling suddenly ceased; presumably it permeated. to her brain
cell what the purpose of the boy’s. abuse was.

This and other set-up situations are. obviously calculated to provoke a
direct confrontation which would bring in the police, with. the abusers
claiming. that they were the ones attacked. Again in 1992, outside the
house where I was. living in Oxford I was physically attacked by someone –
not punched, just grabbed by the. coat, with some verbals thrown in for good
measure. That was something the people at. work shouldn’t have known
about… but soon after a. couple of people were talking right in front of
me about, "I heard he was attacked".. The UK police have a responsibility
for preventing assault occurring, but they do not seem to take any. interest
in meeting that responsibility. I. suppose their attitude is that harassment
does not come within their remit unless it involves physical assault,. and
they will only become involved once that. happens. That is of course quite
the. wrong attitude for them to take, but as I now understand, the police
investigate only the crime they. wish to investigate; if they do not take
your complaints seriously then there is. nothing you can do to make them
take. action.

3550

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

M,I.5,Persecuti on , my respo nse to t he har assment

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= my response to. the harassment -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

My first reaction in 1990/91 was to assume that. if I broke contact then
they would not be. able to follow and would lose interest. So I did the
things that have been suggested by other people; I. sold my television,
stopped listening to the radio and tried to. withdraw away from the sources
of abuse as much as possible. I reasoned that they must. have more important
things to deal. with and that normal people would simply leave me alone if
it. were made difficult for them to continue their harassment.

I reckoned without the sheer vindictiveness. of the abusers. They did not
let up but instead "got to" people. around me, mainly people at work, to do
their dirty work for them. I went to see my GP, who refused to. believe what
he was being told, and refused to direct. me on to anyone who could be of
practical assistance. It was not until three years had passed that the. GP
admitted the matter was. outside his competence and suggested going to the
police.

In the summer of. 1994 we called in counter-surveillance experts from a
private detective agency. to sweep our house and telephone for bugging
devices. They conducted a. thorough search and found nothing; but as noted
above,. since the existence of surveillance was being forced in my face by
the harassers,. you would expect them to have taken the possibility of a
counter-surveillance sweep. into account when planning the type of devices
to be. employed.

In Easter 1995 I made a complaint to my local Police. station in London, but
the police. have not expressed any intention to do anything about the
continuing harassment ("we’re not saying it’s happening. and we’re not
saying it isn’t happening" were the words used). I think the officer. I
spoke to at Easter wasn’t. aware of it happening, although other members of
the police force obviously. do know.

From April 1995 until the. present time the matter has been discussed in a
lot of. detail on the Usenet (Internet) "uk.misc" newsgroup. That discussion
has given birth to the article. which you are now reading. My hopes in
posting to Usenet were that wider publicizing would discourage the. security
services from. continuing their harassment, and "draw people out" into
concurring with the truth of what was being. said. Neither of those have
followed, but the discussion has. served a purpose in allowing this
structured report. to be created.

8410

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

…'08 Beijing Olympics/Spielberg vs. '36 Hitler Olympics/Leni Riefenstahl C @ C please

Stephen Spielberg, the celebrated director of numerous
Hollywood blockbusters, is the ‘artistic director’ for the
upcoming Olympics in Beijing this August. Not unlike
the roal played by the film maker Leni Riefenstahl
in the ’36 Berlin Olympics.

His job is to do nothing less than help …legitimize.. the
largest and most repressive government in the history
of the human race. He is working hand-in-hand with
the Chinese Communist Party to help continue the
indefinite enslavement of a FIFTH of the human race.

China today is a combination of searing political
repression, with a market system that practices the
most corrupt and abusive form of capitalism imaginable.  
Without democratic checks and balances, China’s free
market is only free for those in power and money.

A grand party, a champagne event, where over a
billion people are herded, sheep-like, passed banners
reading "One World One Dream" and into a stadium
with no exits. Just work until they die.

Even Orwell would blush at the spectacle.

What would we think of famous producers of the past if
they’d been an key part of Hitler’s Berlin Olympics of ’36?  
If, say, Frank Capra had spent months working
with the Nazis in ’36 Berlin, would we now remember
him for all his great movies?

No, he would be remembered only as the Hollywood
director that helped Hitler. Pleading that working
the Olympics gave him influence with the policies
of Hitler would fall on deaf ears, just as it will
with Spielberg and his failed efforts with Darfur.

Stephen Spielberg is about to make such a timeless
mistake.

Legitimizing the Chinese Communist Party is nothing
less than a crime against humanity.

Stephen Spielberg is …right now….substantially
contributing to the greatest crime against humanity
since the holocaust.

This will be his legacy and professional epitaph.
We should make sure of this.

s

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (2)

M.I 5.Perse cution . wh y t he securi ty service s?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-= why the security. services? -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

You may ask, why do. I think the "they" referred to are the security
services? Is there any evidence that there is a single. source, as opposed
to a loosely based "whispering. campaign" amongst many people? Even if there
is a single source,. is there any evidence that "they" are professional
"buggers" as opposed. to amateurs, or perhaps people working for a privately
funded. organization?

a) As to the question of a. single source versus something more fragmented;
it is quite obvious that there is a single source from the way the. campaign
has. been carried out. Since things have been repeated verbatim which were
said in my home, there must be. one group which does the watching and
listening. Since on several occasions (mainly during. travel) people have
been. planted in close proximity and rehearsed in what they were to say, it
follows that someone must have. done the planning for that, and again a
single source. is indicated.

b) So why. couldn’t it be amateurs? Why couldn’t it be a private
organisation, for example a. private detective agency paid to manage the
campaign and undertake. the technical aspects? Some detective agencies are
unscrupulous as has been proved on the occasions in the. past when they’ve
been exposed or caught; they too can. have access to the bugging technology
deployed; and there are. reported cases of MI5 paying private eyes to do
their dirty work. (against peace campaigners and similar enemies of the
state) on the understanding that if. they were caught then they could deny
all knowledge. Why couldn’t that. be the case?

The main. factor pointing to direct security service involvement (as opposed
to amateurs or MI5 proxies) is the breadth of their access to the. media in
particular, and the fact that the television companies are so involved. in
the campaign. The BBC would not directly invade someone’s. home themselves,
since it would not be within their remit. to allocate personnel or financial
resources to do so. An organisation of. their stature would not take part in
a campaign set up by private. sources. The only people they would take
material from would be the security services,. presumably on the assumption
that if the cat ever flew out of the bag yowling it. would be MI5 who would
take. the consequences.

State sponsorship for these acts of psychological terrorism is. also
indicated by duration;. support for over six years for a team of three or
four people would be beyond the means and. will of most private sources.
The viciousness of. the slanders and personal denigration also points to
MI5; they traditionally "protect" the British. state from politicians of the
wrong hue by character assassination, and in this. case are using their
tried and tested methods to murder with words. an enemy they have invented
for. themselves.

And there are precedents. Diana and Hewitt were alleged to. have been filmed
"at it" by an. Army intelligence team which had operated in Northern
Ireland, these allegations. were made by someone called Jones who had been
on the team. His statements were. denied by the defence establishment who
tried to character-assassinate by describing him as the. "Jones twins".
Funny. how if you tell the truth, then you must be ill, isn’t it? Thought
only communists behaved like. that?

Hewitt. later said that he’d been spoken to by someone in the army who
revealed the. existence of videotapes of him and Diana, and that the tapes
would be published if any attempt was made by them to. resume their
association.

1118

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

M I.5'Pers ecution , why t he secur ity services ?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-= why the security. services? -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

You may. ask, why do I think the "they" referred to are the security
services? Is there any evidence. that there is a single source, as opposed
to a loosely. based "whispering campaign" amongst many people? Even if there
is a single source, is there any evidence that "they" are. professional
"buggers" as. opposed to amateurs, or perhaps people working for a privately
funded. organization?

a) As to the question of a single source versus. something more fragmented;
it is quite. obvious that there is a single source from the way the campaign
has been carried out. Since things. have been repeated verbatim which were
said in my home, there must be one. group which does the watching and
listening. Since on several occasions (mainly during travel) people. have
been planted in close proximity and rehearsed in what they were. to say, it
follows that someone must. have done the planning for that, and again a
single source is. indicated.

b) So. why couldn’t it be amateurs? Why couldn’t it be a private
organisation, for example a private detective agency paid to. manage the
campaign and undertake the technical aspects? Some detective. agencies are
unscrupulous as has been proved on the occasions in. the past when they’ve
been exposed or caught; they too. can have access to the bugging technology
deployed; and there are reported cases of. MI5 paying private eyes to do
their dirty work (against peace campaigners and similar. enemies of the
state) on the understanding that. if they were caught then they could deny
all knowledge. Why. couldn’t that be the case?

The main factor pointing to. direct security service involvement (as opposed
to amateurs or MI5. proxies) is the breadth of their access to the media in
particular,. and the fact that the television companies are so involved in
the campaign. The BBC would not. directly invade someone’s home themselves,
since it would. not be within their remit to allocate personnel or financial
resources to do. so. An organisation of their stature would not take part in
a campaign set up by private sources. The only. people they would take
material from would be. the security services, presumably on the assumption
that if the cat ever flew out of the bag yowling. it would be MI5 who would
take the. consequences.

State sponsorship for. these acts of psychological terrorism is also
indicated by duration; support for over six years for a. team of three or
four people would be beyond the means. and will of most private sources.
The viciousness of the slanders and. personal denigration also points to
MI5; they traditionally "protect" the British state from politicians. of the
wrong hue by character assassination, and in this case are using. their
tried and tested. methods to murder with words an enemy they have invented
for. themselves.

And there are precedents. Diana. and Hewitt were alleged to have been filmed
"at it" by an Army intelligence team which had operated in. Northern
Ireland, these allegations were made by someone called Jones who. had been
on. the team. His statements were denied by the defence establishment who
tried to character-assassinate by describing him as the "Jones. twins".
Funny how if you tell the truth, then you must be ill, isn’t it?. Thought
only communists behaved. like that?

Hewitt later said that he’d been spoken. to by someone in the army who
revealed the existence of videotapes. of him and Diana, and that the tapes
would be published if any attempt was made by them. to resume their
association.

1118

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

DO THEY KNOW ITS CELEBRATION TIME?

Do they know
Its christmas?
All innocent folks
In jail awaiting trial,
Denied justice and dignity,
Denied rights and priviledges.
Do they know
Its new year?
All employable unemployed,
Denied jobs,
Denied daily bread.
Do they know
Its sallah?
All pensioners
Struggling in vain
To receive pensions.
Do they know
Its celebration time?
All men
Rushed to warfronts
To massage egos
Of war mongers.
Do they know
Its season of joy?
All widows,
All fatherless
Adorned in mourning apparells.

   (This poem is dedicated to all persons on the fringe of existence)

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Four Ways to Peace…Divine Attribute Of Al Hakeem (The Wise)….In Connection With: 1-The Reciter Of God's Signs; 2,3-The Teacher Of The Book and Wisdom; 4-The Purifyer.

=(1)=  *And our Lord, raise among them a Messenger from among
themselves, who may recite to them Thy Signs and teach them the Book
and Wisdom and may purify them; surely, Thou art the Mighty, the
Wise.* (2:130)

*****

=(2)=This verse was also touched in  current Eid-Sermon/Khutba www.mta.tv
in terms of the high standards of sacrifice as set by holy Hadhrat
Ibrahim (on whom be peace) who had made this prayer to Allah
supplicating for a great prophet to be born among his people.

*****
=(3)= Hadrat Ibrahim (on whom be peace) had prayed for a prophet to
come to set high standards in four aspects in his supplication,
standards that did not have a precedent and which were not to be
matched at a later stage…… These standards would be unprecedented
because human mind and spirituality had not reached the point of
excellence where Allah had willed to take it…… Hadhrat Ibrahim   had
an insight and a perception of the far-reaching point where Allah was
to take the intellectual and spiritual progress of man and had made
the prayer with this knowledge that when Allah would decree for the
time to arrive when intellectual and spiritual progress would be
polished to human perfection, then for its attainment a prophet of God
may come from among his people who would introduce new aspects of
spiritual cognisance to people, make them aware of the existence of
Allah and bring the last Shariah to them.
*****
=(4)= The four aspects the prophet was to set lofty standards of were:
recitation of God’s signs, teaching of the Book, imparting of Wisdom
and his teaching be such that it would purify those among whom his
advent would take place and as well as others who were yet to be born
till the Day of Judgment…… Indeed the verse concludes in acknowledging
that Allah is the Mighty and the Wise and that only He could create a
man so perfect and grant him the wisdom as elucidated in the verse.
*****
=(5)= Hadhrat Ibrahim (on whom be peace) prayed that the fulfilment of
his sacrifice would be in the prophet with the above mentioned
qualities to be born from among his progeny (from the progeny of
Ishmael) and that he would set examples of supreme excellence…… His
prayer is mentioned in Surah Baqarah, verse 130, and its acceptance is
also recorded in Surah Baqarah in verse 152 in that the advent of such
a prophet indeed came to pass…. In addition, verse 3 of Surah Al
Jummah (62:3) also repeats the subject of 2:130. …
*****
=(6)= Hadhrat Ibrahim (on whom be peace) prayed to Allah for the
prophet-to-come to recite the Signs of Allah, to teach, to impart
wisdom and to purify (2:130)….. When Allah accepted the prayer, He
declared (2:152 and 62:3 ) that He had indeed sent the Prophet, who,
in accordance with the prayer, firstly recites the Signs of Allah…..
This change in order, the holy Caliph said, is owing to specific
divine wisdom which he would expound at a later time. For now the four
aspects for which supplication was made for this prophet is explained.
*****
=(7)=The first of these supplications was for the prophet to recite
Signs (Ayah) of God to people….. According to lexicons Ayah means,
‘signs’, ‘miracles’, ‘warning that works as advice’ as well as
‘piece’….. So we may infer from the verse that the teaching revealed
to this prophet, which he may take to the people, may be comprised of
signs and miracles about which he may give reasoning to revive faith
in Allah.
*****
=(8)= In terms of the meaning of Ayah as ‘piece’ or plural ‘pieces’
the import is that the teaching of this prophet was to be revealed
piece-meal…… In the verse of acceptance of prayer (2:152) it is
confirmed that indeed this teaching was revealed piece-meal and this
in turn was made a Sign of its truth.
*****
=(9)= The Promised Messiah (on whom be peace) has deemed the
revelation of the Holy Qur’an piece-meal (17:107 & 25:33) as a
specific sign. The Qur’an was revealed over a period spanning twenty
three years as a proof of its truthfulness. During this period the
Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) faced the severest of
times where he experienced many battles as well as attempts were made
to take his life. Until the time the Quranic revelations were complete
and Allah declared that its message was perfected (5:4) none of the
attempts on the life of the Prophet were successful and ultimately he
met his death due to natural causes.
*****
=(10)=In addition, at that time, mankind had not reached a stage where
they could take the message of the Qur’an but in pieces. Indeed their
faith was resolute in its perfection; however, they were a long way
off in reaching the pinnacle of attaining knowledge and learning…..
Today the human mind has greatly evolved with the aid of knowledge and
sciences……[ By way of example the holy Caliph mentioned Dr. Abdus
Salam (Nobel laureate from his Community). Dr. Salam  based all his
research work on Quranic verses]….. With the spread of knowledge
mankind has understood God’s existence in a better, more perceptive
manner…… At the time of the advent of the Holy Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allah be on him) each religion was embroiled in overt or
covert shirk (associating partners with Allah), those who were
apparently religious had forgotten the reality of God……The holy Caliph
said the situation these days is the same and he will give a discourse
on this in his future sermons.
*****
=(11)= When Hadhrat Ibrahim (peace be on him) had made his prayer with
the knowledge that an era would come that would be even more perilous
than his era, and he had prayed to Allah for a prophet to be sent,
from among his people, at that time to make people aware of Allah’s
existence with proofs and reasoning.
*****
=(12)=  Allah says: *And who strive in Our path, We will surely guide
them in Our ways. And verily Allah is with those who do good.*
(29:70):  It is the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on
him) who showed the way to reach Allah….The Promised Messiah (on whom
be peace) says this informs us that in order to unravel spiritual
discernment and knowledge striving is essential and for this we have
the blessed model of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be on him)
before us. Forsaking this, many people opt to follow the so-called
holy people (Peers) who do not even operate within the parameters of
the Shariah but make all sorts of claims in enhancing their
status……..The holy Caliph of holy promised Messiah said when Allah the
Exalted has furnished us with all that we need to know, has given us
the reasoning and the proofs, then it is our task to make an effort
and strive for spiritual development – and this cannot be attained
through so-called saints and holy people. Rather it can be achieved
through the ways expounded by the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of
Allah be on him) and through the miracles and signs that he
demonstrated in his blessed life. The so-called Peers do not lead one
to God. Indeed Allah Himself comes to those who seek Him through the
signs and indications as exemplified by the Holy Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allah be on him).
*****
=(13)= According to lexicon the word Ayah also signifies chastisement/
torment. In the verses (first explained earlier) the word ‘recite’
also signifies that the Prophet will warn against the torment or
chastisement to people….. This is the reason the Holy Qur’an has
expounded the incidents of the earlier prophets as a warning for the
world in general as well as for those who believe the Qur’an. Divine
punishment comes to those who try to meddle with Allah’s Divinity.
Denying or rejecting a prophet of God, although a great misfortune,
does not necessarily bring about Divine punishment, unless and until
all limits are exceeded in terms of sedition and disorder. The holy
Caliph of holy promised Messiah prayed: May Allah guide the world at
large and may He grant to all the correct insight and perception of
the teachings of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on
him) so that the capacity to turn to Him is attained. …(Rest of the
subject will continue latter).
Promised divine peace in latter days :    www.alislam.org  :      www.mta.tv
with
              LOVE FOR ALL HATRED FOR NONE. LOVE FOR ALL HATRED FOR
NONE.

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

The Ride (Combat Zone) by Will Dockery:

The Ride (Combat Zone) by Will Dockery:

http://www.archive.org/details/TheRidecombatZoneByWillDockery

Driving through the combat zone
a rasta steps out,
sort of calling my name —
a reasonable approximation.
Variation of my street name I guess.
Said he could take me to see Raine,
apparently the rastas have her locked up in a house
somewhere in the combat zone.

Girl of these woods and chemicals,
we labor for the black pigs of poetry,
for the bone gods of the sea,
for the secret rose you keep for me,
under the skirts of printed sunflowers.

He wanted money for his information,
at which point I was to park and walk.
It seemed very sinister, the thought of Raine held prisoner
But he smoothed it over fairly often.
said I could come back later,
when the bad vibes wore down.

There is a hollering and someone has a
dog that barks,
your eyes have that recently crying look,
and your hair seems as soft
and your smell as sweet, as before,
as that last time you came to my door,
in a skirt of printed sunflowers

Rasta gets crazy on me in the car,
wanting five dollars, two bucks, anything.
I give him nothing, just smoke and drink.
He’s got an ice pick in his hand,
makes it sound like he’s got a gun.
I’d already heard Raine was in jail
but I didn’t expect a rasta jail.

But it has been seen that you look
straight through,
I fear that you are already gone,
that night you tried to die in my arms,
is something that I will not forget
or make sense of,
you and your skirt of printed sunflowers.

The image crossed my mind how it might feel
if he jabbed that icepick into me
a couple of times or more.
Just curious to see if he’d do it or not,
could I stop him, I could tell I didn’t know.

I think that you no longer see nothing,
and God knows what kind
of love is this,
you told me that you never stopped loving me,
but you could never return to me,
in your skirt of sunflowers
in your skirt of sunflowers

I just stare and talk about money.
I bummed a cigarette from him.
I told him I’d be in touch about Raine.
He said, "Man, you crazy.", and walked off.
I went back home to think.

Girl of these woods and chemicals,
we labor for the black pigs of poetry,
for the bone gods of the sea,
for the secret rose you keep for me,
under the skirt of printed sunflowers.

Will Dockery

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments